It's always a hoot-and-a-half to find deep spec authenticity. For example, I am intrigued by a line in one of the 800 letters Vincent van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo. The year is 1885 and Vincent is being covertly hostile to his little brother. He gives him a dig about what he was wearing in a recent visit to the parent's home in Neunan. Theo was by that time a bigtime art seller for Groupal, the company co-owned by their uncle, also named Vincent van Gogh, but called Cent. It doesn't help that Vincent was a total failure at selling art in his short-lived Groupal employ, attacking customers for their bad taste in art and taunting them to buy something better. Vincent's little brother, Theo, was everything that Vincent was not: smooth, polite and a good salesman.
Here is the line that intrigued me: "I cannot help seeing you in my mind's eye wearing a pince-nez with sunglasses." I'm not familiar with the French language, so I thought that a pince-nez was perhaps a style of suit, but the part that is incredible is that Theo had on sunglasses! I wondered what they looked like, and, of course, gravitated to the Benjamin Franklin style round ones:
Daily Whip Out: "Theo In Ben-Franklin-Style-Sunglases"
Fast forward to the Cave Creek Wild West Days Parade least Saturday. Tom and Doree, of Historic EyeWear Company (their motto is: "Keeping History in Sight") were in town and decided to join us for the parade. As we stood waiting for the parade to begin I got to questioning Tom about sunglasses in 1885. Tom informed me the Ben Franklin round glass frames went out of style in the early 1800s and oval lenses became popular. By 1885, the "oval temple spectacles" nose bridge became passe and the Pince-nez (French for "pinched nose") style became trendy. I asked Tom what color might the lenses be and he said, "Blue was very popular." So, now we get a better idea of what Theo may have looked liked:
Daily Whip Out: "Theo's Blue Pince-Nez Sunglasses"
I envision Theo at the train station, arriving in Neunan, with the hipster glasses on:
Daily Whip Out: "Theo On The Nuenan Train Platform"
Vincent hated affectation of any kind. One time a visiting artist offered to look as his artwork and when he reached out to turn a page, Vincent noticed his cuff link and launched off on how much he hated anyone who would wear such ostentatious crap!
So it pays to find the people who have spent their lives studying a particular aspect of historical ostentatious crap, and here they are:
Tom and Doree of Historic EyeWear Company
That's Gary, "The Horseback Singing Cowboy" behind them getting ready for the parade.
And here's a link to their website:
Okay, this just in from Gay Mathis: "From reading the actual Jan 31, 1885 letter it lists in translation for zwartglas as "black glass" and I agree with Gold Lady probably no side pieces. Lorgnette as he wrote "lorgnet" in the letter." And here's the actual excerpt from the letter:
This doesn’t change a person very much, you’ll say.
Maybe so — but my impression is that you have perhaps, in a sense other than the literal one, acquired dark glasses in what you think and do. Suspicion, for instance."
And if you want to read the entire letter here it is:
Van Gogh letter in question
"My future's so bright I have to wear shades."
—Pop song from the nineties
I thought pince-nez glasses had no side pieces - they just clipped on to the nose?
ReplyDeleteFrom reading the actual Jan 31, 1885 letter it lists in translation for zwartglas as "black glass" and I agree with GoldLady probably no side pieces..Lorgnette as he wrote "lorgnet" in the letter..
ReplyDeletehttp://vangoghletters.org/vg/letters/let481/letter.html
Thank you Gay and Gold Lady. So, I am assuming he had black glass?
DeleteMaybe van Gogh was describing something along the lines of "Smoked Glass"
ReplyDeleteSee this book, if it helps, for examples photo groups 458 & 459 on pg 250
Spectacles and Other Vision Aids: A History and Guide to Collecting-- By J. William Rosenthal
https://books.google.com/books?id=lp4LAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA250#v=onepage&q&f=false
Your quick sketch (whip-out) adeptly captures the hustle and bustle of a train arrival.
ReplyDeleteThe art dealer where Theo (and Vincent, briefly) worked was called Goupil.
Your quote from Vincent's letter to Theo gives another example of why Vincent was so hard to take. Here Theo was supporting him financially and morally, and he has the nerve to complain about Theo's dark pince-nez, saying they colored his thinking and behavior, making him "suspicious," for example.
Thanks Murray. Yes, Groupil it is, not Groupal. And double yes on Vincent's insufferable attitude. He was a piece of work, that boy. Still love him, though.
ReplyDeletePince-nez have no temples/arms over the ears. They have a spring steel bridge/nose piece that ''pinches the nose." Difficult to keep in place when active and very uncomfortable, although this did not hinder their popularity in the last quarter of the 19th century. Worn low on the nose for reading and high on the nose for distance. The reference to black glass is most likely very dark glass lenses of neutral/smoke (grey), green or possibly blue lenses. All appear blackish when worn.
ReplyDeleteTommyspecs, here's a question for you I have wondered about: if someone wore a monocle, did he/she have poor vision in just one eye? Also, did the wearer have to consciously scrunch it between the brow and upper cheek to hold it in place?
ReplyDeleteMurray, usually poor vision would affect both eyes. When wearing a monocle, the eye with the monocle would become the dominant eye, whether the correction was for distance or near. Today, after cataract surgery, one option you may choose is to have one eye corrected for distance vision and the other eye corrected for near vision. The same can be done with contact lenses in order to eliminate wearing eyeglasses. Depending on the focal distance, one eye would become dominant eye. A monocle would work on the same principle.
ReplyDeleteMonocles could be sized and fitted to an individual for a somewhat comfortable fit. You would need a good Optician. Off the shelf monocles were most likely uncomfortable and a sudden surprise or shock could send the monocle to the floor or into the wearers soup!